<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.5" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Jack Elfrink Dot Com</title>
	<link>http://jackelfrink.com</link>
	<description>Given just enough rope .....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>What drives techonology?</title>
		<description>In the 70s,there was a format war between VHS and Betamax. Betamax was general the better format, but porn embraced VHS and today VHS is the standard format. Likewise, in the 00s there was a format war between bluray and HD-DVD. History repeated itself and porn embrased HD-DVD while blu-ray ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/224</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Gross misrepresentation</title>
		<description>I just recently read that the season opener of Bullshit staring penn and teller covered the topic of the war on porn. As I dont own a television, and havent seen the episode in question, I cant comment that much on it. But theyt do interview Craig Gross and I ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/223</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dammit! Where are the pics?</title>
		<description>Ok, so a judge in a porno trial had porn on his homepage. The legal aspects of this I will comment on at some other time. For now, I know the question on everyones mind is 'So lets see em!'

The website is now offline. I tried seeing if there was ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/217</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Its the economy stupid</title>
		<description>California is proposing a new bill. The bill would have a negiative impact on the porn industry.  The bill is being suported by democrats. It is being blocked by republicans.

Some folks have a hard time understanding this. After all, so the logic goes, the democrats stand up for diversity ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/216</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Dont these people have work to do?</title>
		<description>16,500 condoms for 125 people?

Assuming everyone at the research station is paired up, thats 264 condoms per couple. Or just over 5 a week. </description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/215</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>fox in the henhouse</title>
		<description>Jack Tuckner practices a sadomasochistic lifestyle. He wore a slave collar at work and is being sued for sexual harasement.

Well its obvious what happened? Right? Some right wing neocon religious zealot who hates everything that isnt missionary position was offended by his lifestyle. they want to opress anything that dosent ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/214</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>CLICK HERE FOR ILLEGAL CHILD PORN!</title>
		<description>CLICK HERE FOR ILLEGAL CHILD PORN!

Ok, so that was a rather nasty thing for me to do. But was it against the law? The decision is in from the supreme court on the US v Williams case. At issue is the issue of pandering. Can a person be charged with ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/213</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>there is no friend</title>
		<description>So I catch news today about the Combating Child Exploitation Act. A new bill being proposed in congress to fight child porn on the internet. As if the Communications Decency Act of 1996, Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996, Child Online Protection Act of 1998, Children's Internet Protection Act of ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/212</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>its been a week and Im still here</title>
		<description>Last week bdsm newsgroups and forums were in a total panic atack over the 'extreme porn' ban that was going into law. All the usual tales of woe and inpending doom came out. Now that the law actualy has been pased lets examine some of the usual 'talking points'.

 The ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/211</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Seller beware</title>
		<description>Ok, lets just run down the score here .....

Law againt seloing tabaco to those under age 18? No problem.

Law against  selling alchoal to those under age 18? No problem.

Law againt selling guns to those under age 18? No problem.

Law againt selling porn to those under age 18? Dear god! ...</description>
		<link>http://jackelfrink.com/archives/210</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
