Comments on: But it has the word ‘netural’ in it. How can that be bad? http://jackelfrink.com/archives/310 Given just enough rope ..... Sat, 19 May 2012 17:41:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: TheHungryTiger http://jackelfrink.com/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-577 TheHungryTiger Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:48:35 +0000 http://jackelfrink.com/?p=310#comment-577 Gee, what was that I was saying about using buzzwords to get people to react on an emotional level? Gee, what was that I was saying about using buzzwords to get people to react on an emotional level?

]]> By: David http://jackelfrink.com/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-572 David Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:49:42 +0000 http://jackelfrink.com/?p=310#comment-572 But net nuturing has already happened. Several ISP have already been caught filtering certain types of data. If this type of thing had been agreed upon in the service contracts etc.. by the purchasers of the connections it may be one thing. But the ISP were even caught lying that they were filtering the traffic at all. Net neutrality has a lot more than what the ISP is going to charge the end user. Take this into consideration. You get into a taxi cab. You ask to go to location X. The driver says I cannot take you to location X as location X has not paid US connection fees. I will take you to location Y instead. No you don't have a choice you are in my cab I am taking you there anyway. The ISPs are trying to double bill. They want to charge u for your connection to the content publishers and the content publishers for their connection to you. regardless of the fact that the content publishers are already paying for their Internet connection. But net nuturing has already happened.
Several ISP have already been caught filtering certain types of data. If this type of thing had been agreed upon in the service contracts etc.. by the purchasers of the connections it may be one thing. But the ISP were even caught lying that they were filtering the traffic at all.
Net neutrality has a lot more than what the ISP is going to charge the end user.
Take this into consideration.
You get into a taxi cab.
You ask to go to location X.
The driver says I cannot take you to location X as location X has not paid US connection fees. I will take you to location Y instead. No you don’t have a choice you are in my cab I am taking you there anyway.

The ISPs are trying to double bill. They want to charge u for your connection to the content publishers and the content publishers for their connection to you. regardless of the fact that the content publishers are already paying for their Internet connection.

]]>