Comments on: fox in the henhouse http://jackelfrink.com/archives/214 Given just enough rope ..... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:19:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Jack ElFrink http://jackelfrink.com/archives/214/comment-page-1#comment-86 Jack ElFrink Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:51:16 +0000 http://jackelfrink.com/?p=214#comment-86 There is something deeply ironic about a post blaming 'same right-wing puritans' as a response to an entry about how kinksters knee-jerk reactions are always to blame right wing puritans. There is something deeply ironic about a post blaming ’same right-wing puritans’ as a response to an entry about how kinksters knee-jerk reactions are always to blame right wing puritans.

]]> By: NYCBlogger http://jackelfrink.com/archives/214/comment-page-1#comment-85 NYCBlogger Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:16:28 +0000 http://jackelfrink.com/?p=214#comment-85 Secundo: As you have admitted to the fact that this is the only article you have read about this case. So perhaps you have commented on the case before watching how this story had unfolded- Of course tuckner has been defended by most in different websites and blogs as we have seen. In this case there is no bonafide sexual harassment as you are alleging. On the contrary looks like he has become a victim of the same right-wing puritans and/or of the simplistic reactionary feminists. People can easily talk of their straight lifestyles and exhibit their signs of love towards their spouses at workplace in our society, but come anything remotely related to alternative lifestyle, and the media jump at moralist conclusions even before the case hits the court.. IMO- Just cuz he is being portrayed on media as the evil guy doesn't mean he is not a good person. Secundo: As you have admitted to the fact that this is the only article you have read about this case. So perhaps you have commented on the case before watching how this story had unfolded- Of course tuckner has been defended by most in different websites and blogs as we have seen. In this case there is no bonafide sexual harassment as you are alleging. On the contrary looks like he has become a victim of the same right-wing puritans and/or of the simplistic reactionary feminists. People can easily talk of their straight lifestyles and exhibit their signs of love towards their spouses at workplace in our society, but come anything remotely related to alternative lifestyle, and the media jump at moralist conclusions even before the case hits the court..

IMO- Just cuz he is being portrayed on media as the evil guy doesn’t mean he is not a good person.

]]> By: secundo http://jackelfrink.com/archives/214/comment-page-1#comment-84 secundo Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:39:06 +0000 http://jackelfrink.com/?p=214#comment-84 Why is the kink community not defending him? My theory from the tiny sample of this one article is that he sounds like he has a bad case of male chauvinist sleaze. He isn't being sued for harassment because of an 'innocent' collar. He is being sued for harassment because of allegations of bonafide sexual harassment. His personal kink is just window dressing for the media to sensationalize. IMO - Just cuz he is kinky doesn't mean he is a good person Why is the kink community not defending him? My theory from the tiny sample of this one article is that he sounds like he has a bad case of male chauvinist sleaze. He isn’t being sued for harassment because of an ‘innocent’ collar. He is being sued for harassment because of allegations of bonafide sexual harassment. His personal kink is just window dressing for the media to sensationalize.

IMO - Just cuz he is kinky doesn’t mean he is a good person

]]>